Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Evolution: Science and Religion Essay -- essays research papers fc

Evolution Science and ReligionIn 1895 Charles Darwin published a book describing his possibleness of evolution, and his theory of the natural selection process. This theory caused much uproar in the religious community because Darwins theory went against the story of creation portrayed in the Holy Bible. His theory claimed that all life currently in place had evolved and adapted from a single organism in the beginning. Over time and by process of natural selection only the dominant species were left over while the other, less dominant species, went extinct. His theory, backed by scientific analysis, had dismissed the approximation of a single deity creating all life on Earth. It is not like Darwin had a personal ag nullifya against religion or anything, but he did create what would become the main conclusion used by atheists to disprove the Bible. Now his theory is still theory, and is yet to be proven as a fact, but is still believed by much of the scientific society as a fact. The struggle between the religious and the atheistic will rage for more years, but where the battle will cause the most damage is in the American school agreement. The thesis of this paper is, watchers must be required to teach evolution which is already in place in the American school system, but teachers cannot be allowed to teach evolution as a fact, or evidence disproving the existence of a god. On top of all of that, they must as well allow the expression of opposing viewpoints.In the American school system there is a constant separation of Church and State. This separation is undisputedly good for keeping the civil rights of students in order. By not allowing the pressures of church in schools, people of power cannot abuse their power for religious preferences. Richard W. Garnett wrote in an article, the separation of church and state is crucial to any attractive vision of religious immunity (Garnett). Teaching children unproven belief as a fact is just as bad as the forci ng of religious beliefs on a student. In the end teachers must learn the importance of teaching evolutionary theories as theory only, and never as actual fact.The clash of creationism and evolution has begun once again. On integrity side sits the Christians and believers of the Holy Bible as a literal piece of history on the other side sits scientists who dismantle any belief in any sort of God. The... ...whether you believe in a deity, or none at all it will require some faith on your take up (Johnson).Works CitedBehe, Michael J. The Concept of Gradual Evolution is Flawed. Creationism vs. Evolution. Ed. By Bruno J. Leone. San Diego, CA Greenhaven Press, 2002 22.Branch, Glenn. Creationists and the Grand Canyon. Humanist Mar./April 2004 EBSCOhost. Seaside High schooldays Lib., Seaside, OR 14 Oct. 2004 Garnett, Richard W. Keep it to Yourself. commonweal Aug. 13 2004 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 14 Oct. 2004 Johnson, Matt. Personal Interview. 18 Jan. 2005Klyce, Brig. Evolution versus Creationism. Panspermia. 14 Oct. 2004 Moore, Randy and Jay Hatch and Murray Jensen. Twenty Questions What Have the Courts verbalize about the Teaching of Evolution and Creationism in Public Schools? Bioscience August 2003 EBSCOhost, Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 29 September 2004 Sheler, Jeffrey. The Pope and Darwin. U.S. intelligence activity and World Report 4 October 1996 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 29 September 2004 Wells, Jonathan. Elusive Icons of Evolution. Natural History April 2004 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 14 Oct. 2004

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.